Election Eve Chaos: Newsom’s Flip-Flops, Mamdani’s Money Trail, and the Final Campaign Pitches
As Election Eve descends, the political landscape is erupting with late-stage controversies, dramatic campaign moments, and stark revelations about political funding. From California Governor Gavin Newsom’s perceived presidential aspirations and policy maneuvers to the surprising financial backing of New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, the final hours before voters head to the polls are marked by an atmosphere of intense political warfare and allegations of hypocrisy and foreign influence.
Newsom’s Implosion: Meme Wars and Presidential Denial
California Governor Gavin Newsom, widely speculated to be a contender for the 2028 presidential race, faced intense scrutiny over his recent public behavior, characterized by critics as “TDS” (Trump Derangement Syndrome).
The Trump-Like Tactic
Newsom was called out on NBC by Kristen Welker for imitating President Donald Trump’s online tactics, including the use of “all cap posts” and “similar memes” (1:11–1:15). Newsom vehemently denied that this was normalizing the behavior, arguing instead that he was trying to put a “mirror up to that madness” because the “normalization of deviancy” was already occurring (1:22–1:47).
Critics, however, dismissed this as a desperate move by an ambitious politician. Commentators argued that Newsom simply became the “meme” he sought to fight, suggesting he was attempting to “become them” (Trump) due to his inability to defeat him ideologically (1:56–2:08). The contrast between his national ambition and California’s reported $68 billion deficit was highlighted as a major vulnerability (2:10–2:13).
The Presidential Flip-Flop
The most damning criticism against Newsom was his blatant flip-flop on his interest in the presidency. Just one week prior, Newsom stated he would be “lying otherwise” if he said he wasn’t considering a run after the 2026 midterms (3:27–3:32). Days later, however, he flatly denied any presidential ambition: “I don’t. I’m not suggesting I am” (3:44–3:46).
This dramatic reversal was labeled a “pathological lying” habit and a “national security risk” by critics like Charlie Kirk (5:36–6:12), who also described the Governor as the “fakest person I think I’ve ever met in my entire life” (5:37–5:38).
The Power Grab: “Rewrite the Rules”
Further fueling accusations of hypocrisy was Newsom’s involvement in a political maneuver critics dubbed a “nuclear gerrymander” (2:49). When discussing the changes in modern politics, Newsom said, “The rules of the game have changed. Now, we have to rewrite the new rules” (2:34–2:39).
This phrase was immediately tied to Prop 50, a proposed measure that would allow a Democrat-controlled commission to redraw districts in an already heavily Democratic state, aiming to “lock in supermajorities and bury Trump’s 2026 map” (2:54–2:59). Critics saw this as Newsom “going full banana Republic” by changing rules only when they suit his party’s advantage (3:01–3:13).
The Mamdani Money Trail: CAIR and Foreign Influence
In New York City, mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s moonshot campaign hit unexpected turbulence as an Islamist activist revealed the surprising financial engine behind his success.
The Role of Muslim Money
Activist Linda Sarsour was captured on video openly admitting the primary financial source for Mamdani’s campaign: “It is our Muslim American communities… it’s Muslim money” (12:19–12:24).
Sarsour detailed that the PACs supporting Mamdani are comprised of “probably over 80% of Muslim American donors in this country,” including high-net donors and grassroots contributors (12:28–12:35). The largest institutional donor was identified as the Unity and Justice Fund PAC, which is the Super PAC associated with CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) (12:38–12:47).
Critics immediately framed this as “foreign influence money” shaping local politics and exploited by “left-wing radicals” (12:57–13:03). This revelation intensified concerns that Mamdani, who has vowed to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and pedals rent freezes and free services (14:20–14:24), represents an anti-American, socialist agenda bankrolled by specific religious and political organizations.
The Socialist Surge
Mamdani’s rise coincides with a reported surge in support for socialism among Democratic voters. A Gallup poll showed that 66% of Democrats now have a positive view of the ideology (10:40–10:49), contrasting sharply with Republicans, where 74% view capitalism positively (10:54–10:58). Critics lamented that Democrats were continuing to shift “farther and farther to the left” instead of seeking the middle ground (11:06–11:18).
Final Pitches and Polling Updates
As Election Day approached, several other races were highlighted, alongside instances of alleged election irregularities.
New Jersey Governor’s Race
The New Jersey gubernatorial race between Trump-backed Jack Ciattarelli and Mikey Sherrill (D) was neck-and-neck, with Sherrill holding a slight edge (14:41–14:45). The state, which hasn’t seen three consecutive Democratic administrations in over a century, is a critical test. Ciattarelli was featured in a heartwarming, emotional campaign moment where his father, who serves in the military, returned overnight to vote for him (15:15–15:30).
Virginia’s 7th District
In Virginia, Democrat Abigail Spanberger was fighting to hold a 10-point lead against Republican Winsome Earl Sears (15:58–16:03). Both candidates were pushing hard in the final hours, with the entire GOP ticket rallying behind Sears (16:17–16:26).
Election Integrity Concerns
The report raised concerns over election integrity, citing two specific examples:
California: Democratic candidate
Katie Porter was allegedly seen “handing out free stuff to young voters” waiting in line at UC Irvine (7:03–7:06).
New York: A Democrat was reportedly “illegally campaigning” for Mamdani right outside a poll site (7:18–7:24).
The segment also featured a satirical clip about a voter claiming to “illegally vote for Zohran Mamdani six times” (7:31–7:41) to underscore the need for voter ID and election monitoring, which critics claim Democrats oppose (7:44–7:48).
The overall message remains a stark choice for voters: between what critics call the “chaos” and “fantasy” of the progressive left and the perceived “sanity” and defense of American principles offered by conservatives (16:36–16:42).